Ray Jackson v. Charles Foti, Jr., Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POLITZ, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus, we examine the provisions of Louisiana law governing commitment of persons acquitted of a crime by reason of insanity. We conclude that the due process clause entitles insanity acquit-tees to a hearing before commitment and that the equal protection clause requires a state to afford insanity acquittees substantially the same protections, subject to certain qualifications, as are granted to persons committed under civil commitment statutes. Finding the procedures followed in the instant case to have been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gerald C. Bolton v. David W. Harris, Acting Superintendent of Saint Elizabeths HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Benham v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Herman Francois, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Murray Henderson, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- State v. FouchaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Richard Gallegos, Jr. v. State of Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedures Art. 658 Paragraph a and C(4)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.