Legal Opinion

Herman Francois, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Murray Henderson, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 26, 1988No. 87-3219PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLITZ, Circuit Judge:

Today’s opinion occasions a revisiting of our decision in Jackson v. Foti, 670 F.2d 516 (5th Cir.1982), in which we upheld as constitutional the provisions of Louisiana law relating to the confinement in mental institutions of persons acquitted of crimes by reason of insanity. Although, as discussed herein, a recent change in Louisiana law has removed the provisions involving insanity-acquittees from the constitutional umbrella raised in Jackson v. Foti, we are not now obliged to hold that the present Louisiana procedures violate the due process and equal protection…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. State v. FouchaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  4. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. James Rubio v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API