Legal Opinion

Kletzkin v. Borough of Spotswood Bd. of Educ.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 29, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

136 N.J. 275 (1994)

642 A.2d 993

DOROTHY KLETZKIN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF SPOTSWOOD, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 8, 1993.

Decided June 29, 1994.

Philip H. Shore argued the cause for appellant (Shore & Zahn, attorneys; Mr. Shore and John B. Wolf, on the briefs).

Stephen B. Hunter argued the cause for respondent (Klausner, Hunter, Cige & Seid, attorneys).

Arlene Goldfus Lutz, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent State Board of Education (Fred DeVesa, Acting Attorney General of New…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aeronautical Communications Equipment, Inc. v. PierceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Lally v. CopygraphicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Cammarata v. Essex County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Ward v. KeenanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  5. Spiewak v. Rutherford Bd. of Ed.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API