Legal Opinion

Lally v. Copygraphics

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 27, 1981PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the Appellate Division’s determination, 173 N.J.Super. 162, that a plaintiff has a common law right of action for wrongful discharge based upon an alleged retaliatory firing attributable to the filing of a workers’ compensation claim and that, in addition to, or in lieu of, a judicial cause of action for civil redress, there are available both statutory penal sanctions in a disorderly persons proceeding in municipal court and administrative relief before the Commissioner of Labor and Industry, who has concurrent jurisdiction over such a dispute. Our af-firmance is predicated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Lally v. CopygraphicsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  3. Kaczmarek v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Jaime Blum, Brij Kapur and James C. Spitsbergen, in 86-5349 v. Witco Chemical Corporation, in 86-5310Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Clare R. Bruffett v. Warner Communications, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API