St. Clair Borough v. Souilier
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 65, Oct. T., 1911, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Allegheny Co., Second Term, 1909, No. 353, sustaining exceptions to report of viewers in case of St. Clair Borough v. Magdelena Souilier. Exceptions to report of road viewers. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Errors assigned were in sustaining exceptions to report of viewers.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Potter,
On the petition of the borough of St. Clair the court below appointed three viewers to award damages and assess benefits for the locating and opening of Burr street from Ormsby avenue to Mountain avenue in that borough. On August 25, 1909, the report of the viewers was filed and confirmed nisi. The viewers reported that there were no damages to be awarded, and no benefits to be assessed. Two of the viewers only signed the report, but the exhibits attached show that all the viewers qualified, and signed the notice of the first meeting. On December 11, 1909, more…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harris v. MercurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Springbrook RoadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Griffiths v. Monongahela RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Dunmore Borough School District v. WahlersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Greenwood Township RoadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Armstrong's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Thomas F. Leonard Co. v. Scranton Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Standard Brewing Co. v. Knapp Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Romberger AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Butler Boro. School District v. Penn Township School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.