Legal Opinion

Standard Brewing Co. v. Knapp Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1922No. Appeal, No. 23PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The reasons urged in support of the motion to quash this appeal are as follows:

First. — The record shows that the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, was not based upon a written point presented at the trial requesting binding instructions, as required by the act of assembly.

*254Second. — The assignment of error does not set forth a point in writing or otherwise presented at the trial requesting binding instructions and is not self-sustaining..Third. — There is no assignment of error to the judgment entered on the verdict.

The reason urged by the appellant.in answer thereto;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hanick v. LeaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. St. Clair Borough v. SouilierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Vanderslice v. DonnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Maurer v. BrennanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Butler Boro. School District v. Penn Township School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NathanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Thomas F. Leonard Co. v. Scranton Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Carl v. Grand Union Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Traders Securities Co. v. KalilSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Engelhard v. NordmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API