Legal Opinion

Dunmore Borough School District v. Wahlers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1905No. 2; Appeal, No. 42PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 42, Jan. T., 1905, by defendant, from order of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Nov. T., 1903, No. 514, allowing an appeal nunc pro tunc from the settlement of the accounts of a school district treasurer in case of Dunmore Borough School District v. August Wahlers. Appeal from settlement of accounts of school district treasurer. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order allowing the appeal nunc pro tunc.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

This case and No. 43, January Term, 1905, are appeals by August Wahlers from the judgments and orders of the court below in the two cases which are precisely similar. They came into the court below by appeals from the settlement of defendant Wahler’s accounts as treasurer of the school district of the borough of Dumnore, for the years 1901 and 1902. This opinion will be filed in No. 42, January Term, 1905, but it is intended to apply also to No. 43 of the same term, and in the latter case we will only file a formal order.

The borough of Dunmore was incorporated by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. MercurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Zeigler's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Clair Borough v. SouilierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Butler Boro. School District v. Penn Township School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Berks County v. LindermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. In re Lower Saucon Township School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1931
  5. Mandeville v. Mandeville, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Wayne County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API