Legal Opinion

Rice & Hutchins, Inc. v. Vera Shoe Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 2, 1923No. 227PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The appellant alleges that for 50 years it and its predecessors have been engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling boots and shoes, and that it had established a reputation for quality of its products with the public and the trade, and says that it secured a trade-mark of the name “Vera” for use on boots, shoes, slippers, and ties made partly or wholly of leather, and that it registered the same in the United States Patent Office, receiving a grant of trade-mark on October 13, 1903, under No. 41,276 and on August 7, 1906, under No. 55,041. This trade-mark it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Scandinavia Belting Co. v. Asbestos & Rubber Works of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  5. Von Mumm v. FrashU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Telechron, Inc. v. Telicon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. Baltimore Bedding Corp. v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  4. Queen Mfg. Co. v. Isaac Ginsberg & Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. BalmeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API