Legal Opinion

(PC) Ausborn v. CHCF California

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 13, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00960Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY AUSBORN, No. 2:19-cv-0960 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and 14 CHCF CALIFORNIA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner at the California Health Care Facility (CHCF), under the 19 authority of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). Plaintiff 20 proceeds pro se with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a request for 21 leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API