Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1997No. 21551PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Chief Judge.

Robert Russell Brooks appeals from a docket entry in which the trial court denied his “Petition for Trial De Novo to Review License Revocation pursuant to 302.500 et seq. R.S.Mo.” He contends here that the trial court erroneously admitted certain documentary evidence in the face of his hearsay and lack of foundation objection. We do not address that contention because it is clear that the docket sheet entry is not a judgment under Rule 74.01(a). 1

“Even though not raised by the parties, an appellate court is obliged to notice, sua sponte, matters preventing it from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. City of St. Louis v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Chambers v. Easter Fence Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. In Re the Marriage of BergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Williams v. WestripMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. BALL, II v. ShannonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Lowery v. Air Support International, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Holt v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Rotz v. RotzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Stipp v. MeadowsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API