In Re the Marriage of Berger
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Following trial and a docket sheet entry, both parties appeal. In her brief, appellant Wife questions the finality of the docket entry to be a “judgment.” Wife contends that the docket entry did not dispose of all the issues. We do not reach that contention, as it is apparent that the docket sheet entry is not a judgment under Rule 74.01(a).
Even though not raised by the parties, an appellate court is obligated to notice, sua sponte, matters preventing it from obtaining jurisdiction, Williams v. Westrip, 917 S.W.2d 590, 591 (Mo.App.1996). A prerequisite to appellate review is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Irving v. Goodimate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Newton v. Emerson, Talcott & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
- Sedmak v. Charlie's Chevrolet, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- In Re Marriage of McCoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Orgill Bros. and Co., Inc. v. RhodesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kessinger v. KessingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Linzenni v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Chambers v. Easter Fence Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Sarasohn & Co. v. Prestige Hotels Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Brooks v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.