Legal Opinion

Holt v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1998No. 21765PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

The Missouri Director of Revenue (Director) denied Bill Holt’s application for a permit to drive a school bus. Director claimed that under § 302.272.5, RSMo 1994, Holt was not eligible for a permit due to his alleged conviction in 1959 for non-support. Holt filed a petition for review in the trial court.1 After a trial de novo, the trial court entered an “order” that directed Director to grant Holt the permit. Director attempts to appeal from this “order.” However, at no place is the “order” denominated a “judgment;” consequently, it is insufficient upon which to base an appeal.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. City of St. Louis v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Sarasohn & Co. v. Prestige Hotels Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Brooks v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Holt v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LAKE OSAGE CONDOMINIUM ASS'N v. PrewittMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Holt v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Gentry v. GentryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API