Legal Opinion
Ticknor v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 1947No. Civ. 7350PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKT, J. pro tern.
Plaintiff and appellant commenced an action for declaratory relief in winch he sought to have it decreed that he is a member of the classified service of the city of Sacramento and has the status of a civil service employee under the provisions of the charter of the city of Sacramento and the rules and regulations of the civil service commission made pursuant to the charter provisions.
There is no dispute as to the facts which are substantially as follows; Appellant applied to the city of Sacramento for appointment as a police patrolman in July, 1943. At that time there…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Pinion v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- McGilllicuddy v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Nilsson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Campbell v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Evelyn Jenkins v. County of Riverside Kenneth B. Cohen, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- McNichols v. Police Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Turner v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Snow v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.