Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1946No. Civ. 15522; Civ. 15523PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.

We have before us consolidated appeals by the respective plaintiffs in two actions which they brought against the Board of Civil Service Commissioners of the city of Los Angeles, and others, in which they sought declaratory relief.

In one action David H. Campbell sued for himself, and on behalf of others similarly situated, to establish their status as permanent civil service employees under action theretofore taken appointing them policemen of the city of Los Angeles and declaring that the defendants have no right to discharge them except for cause, under article IX of the city charter. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Pinion v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Nash v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Heard v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Evelyn Jenkins v. County of Riverside Kenneth B. Cohen, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. PoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. METROPOLITAN GOV. OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON CO. v. PoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  4. McNichols v. Police Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  5. Blair v. State ex rel. WattsTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API