Legal Opinion
Stringfield v. International Union of United Rubber
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 27, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 19019PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, Chief Judge.
This motion of the defendants to dismiss the complaint and the amended complaint is brought upon the grounds that the complaint and amended complaint fail to state a claim upon which relief can be founded; that the plaintiffs have failed to exhaust their remedies under the collective bargaining agreements and their internal remedies within the union; that, the matters pleaded are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board; that the action is not brought on behalf of a proper class; and that the plaintiffs have failed to join the United States…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
- Cortez v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- California Ass'n of Employers v. Building and Construction Trades Council of Reno, Nev. And VicinityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brookins v. Chrysler Corporation, Dodge Main DivisionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Anderson v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970
- Durandetti v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
- Imbrunnone v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971
- Stringfield v. International Union Of The United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum And Plastic Workers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.