Legal Opinion
Durandetti v. Chrysler Corporation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 30, 1961No. Civ. A. 18967PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, Chief Judge.
This motion to dismiss asserts that the complaint and amended complaint fail to establish diversity of citizenship of the parties or the presence of a federal question.. The amended complaint alleges that the action “ * * * is brought under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2201, as amended, being 68 Stat. 890; and 29 U.S.C.A. Sec. 157, et seq., 61 Stat. 140, et seq.” The plaintiffs, citizens of the State of Michigan, initiated this action on behalf of themselves and other members of Local 227 of the International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Syres v. Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 23Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Smith v. General Truck Drivers, Etc., Union Local 467District Court, S.D. California · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fred Thompson v. Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, an Unincorporated Railroad Labor Organization, National in ScopeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Harrington v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1969
- Krulikowsky v. Metropolitan District Council of Philadelphia & VicinityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Imbrunnone v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971
- Local Union 1219, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.