Legal Opinion

Stringfield v. International Union Of The United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum And Plastic Workers Of America

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1960No. 14054_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

285 F.2d 764

Ruby STRINGFIELD, for herself, and for and in behalf of Harold P. Lane, Earl Sutton, Barry M. Burkhart, Travis Fulks, James Huff, Joe Hyatt, George M. Brock, Richard L. Johnson, Donald Peltier, Darrel Stringfield, Richard F. Tapia, Paul Dyer, Thornton Greene, R. Hodge, Jack Prince, Jr., Claude G. Brim, Orville D. Leach, Curtis C. Coffee, Harrison H. Holder, Frank Schoen, Philip H. Rouleau, Roy M. Harris, M. A. Satterfield, H. Newsome, William L. Griffin, and all other hourly rated employees in the Detroit plant of the United States Rubber Company, a New Jersey corporation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fingar v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. James A. Gainey v. Brotherhood Of Railway And Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express And Station EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  3. Stringfield v. International Union of United RubberDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Swanee Paper Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API