Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Calhoun

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided October 1, 1998No. 98-5001; Crim.App. No. 32314PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Circuit Judge:1

FACTS

Appellee Clinton Calhoun had his base driving privileges revoked because of repeated infractions. Disobeying this restriction, while driving on base he ignored a security guard’s order to stop. He was offered nonjudicial punishment, which he declined. The Government then convened a special court-martial, and Calhoun was tried for disobeying a lawful order and the driving violation.

At trial, Calhoun was represented by Air Force Area Defense Counsel (defense counsel), Captain K., and civilian counsel, J. Ransdell Keene. His initial defense was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Michael Lovaglia, Martin Clune and Peter PavlisakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. InghamCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  3. United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  4. United States v. McClainCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  5. United States v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API