Legal Opinion
State v. Berube
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 31, 1983No. 82-467PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The defendant, Timothy E. Berube, was convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, RSA 159:3 (Supp. 1981), after a jury trial in Superior Court (Goode, J.). Among the grounds for his appeal is his assertion that the State did not satisfy its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that he had been informed of his Miranda rights before undergoing custodial interrogation, and therefore that incriminating statements made by him were improperly admitted into evidence at his trial. We reverse and remand the case for a new trial.
On September 21, 1981, the defendant was involved in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. PhinneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BenoitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. BrodeurSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. MichaudSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. BaillargeonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.