State v. Phinney
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The issues in this appeal from a conviction for arson are whether certain confessions should have been excluded as being involuntary and whether the trial court erred in using the preponderance standard in initially passing upon the admissibility of the confessions. We hold that the confessions were not inadmissible as a matter of law but that the trial court should have used the reasonable doubt test in determining admissibility of the confessions.
*146Prior to trial the defendant moved to suppress two signed statements. After hearing, the trial court ruled that “on the preponderance standard of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Burton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. PetersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. BowdenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. BenoitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.