State v. Michaud
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The defendant, Paul Michaud, was convicted by a jury of second degree assault for knowingly causing serious bodily harm to an infant boy in violation of RSA 631:2 (1986) (current version at RSA 631:2 (Supp. 1991)). On appeal, he contends that (1) the Superior Court (Mohl, J.) improperly admitted prior bad act evidence under New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 404(b); (2) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove that he had the required mens rea to violate RSA 631:2 (1986); and (3) the trial court improperly denied his motion for a new trial based on jury misconduct. We reverse…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. WoodburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. WhitneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. SimondsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- State v. GruberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- State v. TrainorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. TerrazasArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BassettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. NorlinWashington Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.