Legal Opinion

State v. Michaud

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 10, 1992No. 90-567PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, Paul Michaud, was convicted by a jury of second degree assault for knowingly causing serious bodily harm to an infant boy in violation of RSA 631:2 (1986) (current version at RSA 631:2 (Supp. 1991)). On appeal, he contends that (1) the Superior Court (Mohl, J.) improperly admitted prior bad act evidence under New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 404(b); (2) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove that he had the required mens rea to violate RSA 631:2 (1986); and (3) the trial court improperly denied his motion for a new trial based on jury misconduct. We reverse…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WoodburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. State v. WhitneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. State v. SimondsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. State v. GruberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. State v. TrainorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. TerrazasArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BassettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. State v. NorlinWashington Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API