Legal Opinion

Hooker v. Hoey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 24, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The action is one to recover an alleged overpayment of income tax for the year 1933. The plaintiff’s grievance, as stated in his complaint, is that he received in 1933 the sum of $11,250 as an annuity, that the aggregate consideration paid for the annuity had not yet been received by him, that consequently the item did not constitute taxable income under the Revenue Act of .1932. The collector moves for summary judgment under Rule 56, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c. His moving papers set forth in detail the facts on which the plaintiff’s claim is based, facts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Koshland v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Helvering v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Salz v. State House CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. Hobbs v. LewisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
  5. Police Retirement System v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API