Legal Opinion

Crumpton v. Pilgrim Health & Life Ins. Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1950No. 3 Div. 919PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

J. A. Crumpton, plaintiff below, recovered a judgment against the Pilgrim Health and Life Insurance Company. The basis for the suit is a policy of insurance on the life of Franklin Williams, a stepson of Crumpton, the beneficiary. The nature of the policy is such that a physical examination was not required for its issuance.

After verdict and judgment, the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial. This appeal is by the plaintiff, and he here complains of this action of the court below.

The order granting the motion does not disclose on what ground it was granted.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Parker v. Hayes Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. W. M. Templeton & Son v. DavidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. New York Life Ins. v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Schaeffer v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Briggs v. United Services Life Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gloria L. Schrader v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  3. Clark v. Ala. Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. BlytheCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Spears v. Colonial Bank of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API