Legal Opinion

Deck v. Shields

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1943No. 14445PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Justice.

The plaintiffs sued as remaindermen to recover undivided interests in land, after death of the life-tenant. They relied on a deed which unquestionably vested in them the remainder interests as alleged; but the defendant answered and contended that the deed had been reformed by an equitable decree so as to vest the fee-simple title in the person originally named as life-tenant, from whom he purchased. The court admitted the decree in evidence over objection, and on the entire evidence directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. The plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Wyche v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  3. Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Stanford & Golden v. BradfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  5. Administrators of Ligon v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Prince v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Wasden v. Rusco Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Yablon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Canal Insurance Co. v. CambronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API