Deck v. Shields
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Justice.
The plaintiffs sued as remaindermen to recover undivided interests in land, after death of the life-tenant. They relied on a deed which unquestionably vested in them the remainder interests as alleged; but the defendant answered and contended that the deed had been reformed by an equitable decree so as to vest the fee-simple title in the person originally named as life-tenant, from whom he purchased. The court admitted the decree in evidence over objection, and on the entire evidence directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. The plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Wyche v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Stanford & Golden v. BradfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Administrators of Ligon v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Prince v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Wasden v. Rusco Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Yablon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Canal Insurance Co. v. CambronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.