Yablon v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is error to direct a verdict, except where there is no conflict in the evidence as to the material facts, and the evidence introduced, together with all reasonable deductions and inferences therefrom, demands a particular verdict. Code, § 110-104; Hughes v. Cobb, 195 Ga. 213 (23 S. E. 2d, 701); Shaw v. Probasco, 139 Ga. 481 (77 S. E. 577). In Dixon v. Bristol Savings Bank, 102 Ga. 461, 468 (31 S. E. 96), this court said: “Where reasonable men might differ as to the inferences to be drawn from certain evidence, the matter should be left…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Riley & Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Green v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Dixon v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Wyche v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Wyche v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Davis v. United American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Prince v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Norris v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- DeLong v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- McClure v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.