Legal Opinion

Yablon v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 10, 1946No. 15440, 15441PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is error to direct a verdict, except where there is no conflict in the evidence as to the material facts, and the evidence introduced, together with all reasonable deductions and inferences therefrom, demands a particular verdict. Code, § 110-104; Hughes v. Cobb, 195 Ga. 213 (23 S. E. 2d, 701); Shaw v. Probasco, 139 Ga. 481 (77 S. E. 577). In Dixon v. Bristol Savings Bank, 102 Ga. 461, 468 (31 S. E. 96), this court said: “Where reasonable men might differ as to the inferences to be drawn from certain evidence, the matter should be left…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Riley & Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Green v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Dixon v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Wyche v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  5. Wyche v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Davis v. United American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  2. Prince v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Norris v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. DeLong v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  5. McClure v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API