Legal Opinion

Succession of Marqueze

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 29, 1897No. 12,567PublishedCited by 5 opinions

A PPEAD from the Civil District Court for the ^Parish of Orleans. King, *7.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

•Miller, J.

The plaintiffs, the legal heirs of the deceased, Esteve Marqueze, are appellants from the judgment dismissing their suit to annul the last will of the deceased in nuncupative form by public act. The grounds on which plaintiffs rely to maintain their suit are that the certificate does not show the capacity of the notary by whom it is stated the will was received, nor state the residence or the qualifications of the witnesses. The certificate of the notary in so far as it is material to this discussion is: “ Before me, Charles Rolle, a

notary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Le Blanc v. Baras's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rostrup v. Succession of SpicerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Duhon v. DuhonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Lewis v. Gretna Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Succession of FeitelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  5. Succession of FeitelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API