Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lewis v. Gretna Trust & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 27, 1933No. 32053Published

1DissentRogers, Justice

I think the judgment of the district court should be affirmed. In my view, the rules of interpretation applied to a notarial will in the early eases cited in the majority opinion are entirely too technical, and are not in harmony with the recent tendency of our jurisprudence to limit the rigid enforcement of the formalities required in the execution of wills to those instances in which the law is palpably violated. Succession of Crouzeilles, 106 La. 442, 31 So. 64; Succession of Beattie, 163 La. 831, 112 So. 802.

In Prudhomme v. Savant, 150 La. 256, 90 So. 640, this court held the requirement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Succession of BeattieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Prudhomme v. SavantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Succession of CrouzeillesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. Rongger v. KissingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
  5. Succession of MarquezeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API