Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Reading Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 19, 1971No. Civ. A. 69-1603PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN W. LORD, Jr., Chief Judge.
A brief procedural history of this case is in order, if only to preclude any further motions being made by either party to the present stage of the proceedings (Reading Company and third-party defendant Royce Kershaw) to reopen, reargue, resubmit, or reconsider any preliminary steps to the trial which we believe necessary in this matter, the reasons for which are set forth more fully in our Order.
As recited in our Opinion of September 10, 1971, 53 F.R.D. 453, plaintiff Melvin M. Tucker was injured in the course of his employment with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. Southern Pacific Co. v. Booth-Kelly Lumber CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Meierdierck v. MILLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- John F. Kennedy v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and Third-Party v. United States Steel Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Parks v. Mr. FordDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Tucker v. Reading Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003