Legal Opinion
English v. Bayer, Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 25, 2020No. 6:19-cv-06615Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _______________________________________________ BRIDGET ENGLISH, KAMMIE MINCHER, and ANGEL SCOTT, DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, 19-CV-6615L v. BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER ESSURE INC., and BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Defendants. ________________________________________________ Plaintiffs, former users of the “Essure” medical device, bring this action against defendants, who manufactured and marketed it. Defendants now move (Dkt. #7) to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6), and for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Faber v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Ruffolo v. Oppenheimer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.