Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Eaton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited : St. Louis v. Clemens, 43 Mo. 395 ; Ruggles v. Collier, 43 Mo. 353 ; Sheehan v. Gleason, 46 Mo. 100; Kefferstein v. Knox, 56 Mo. 186; McGrath v. Clemens, 49 Mo. 552; Browne on Stat. Er., sees. 511, 518. cited : Boyce v. Christy, 47 Mo. 70 ; Wyman v. Cory, 48 Mo. 346.

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.

Carroll sued Eaton to the June term, 1873, of the St. Louis Circuit Court, to recover the amount of two tax-bills, one for $244.62, on account of work done in block 925 ; the other for $76.46, on account of work done in block 929. In each case the work alleged to have been done was the paving of an alley in the block. It turned out that defendant owned no property in block 925, and the first count of the petition was abandoned. There was judgment on the second count, to reverse which the defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The petition set forth ‘ ‘ that the defendant is seized and possessed of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Linneus v. LockeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Creamer v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Haegele v. MallinckrodtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API