Legal Opinion

Haegele v. Mallinckrodt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1877Published

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Acts 1869, p. 18; Wag. Stat. 1068, sec. 34 ; Seibert v. Allen, 53 Mo. 44; Woodwards.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Acts 1869, p. 18; Wag. Stat. 1068, sec. 34 ; Seibert v. Allen, 53 Mo. 44; Woodwards. Howard, 13 Wis. 557; Myers v. Kendrick, 13 Iowa, 599 ; Hunter v. Hatch, 45 111. 178 ; Campbell u.May, 31 Ala. 567 ; McNair v. Biddle, 8 Mo. 267 ; Miltenberger v. Morrison, 39 Mo. 79; Brink v. Collier, 56 Mo. 160, 169; Gamble v. City of St. Louis, 12 Mo. 617 ; Kelly v. City of Chicago, 48 111. 388 ; City v. Clemans, 43 Mo. 395 ; Ruggles v. Collier, 43 Mo. 353; City Chart. 1866, art. 8, sec. 11; Rev. Ord. 1866, p. 325, sec. 4; Carroll v. Eaton, 2 Mo. App. 479. cited:…

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.

This is a suit upon three special tax bills, all bearing date January 7, 1867, for the macadamizing of Destrehan Street, from First Street to the Mississippi River. Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment in the Circuit Court for $1,693.80, the amount claimed.

Defendant presented in various forms, in the trial court, a multitude of reasons why he should not be held liable. We note those upon which he seems chiefly to rely for a reversal.

It is claimed that the Circuit Court in general term committed error in modifying the form of the judgment entered at special term, instead of reversing and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. City of Hannibal v. DraperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  3. Sheehan v. GleesonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. Carroll v. EatonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API