Legal Opinion

Creamer v. Allen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Carroll v. Eaton, 2 Mo. App. 479 ; Warren v. Grand Haven, 30 Micb. 24; City of St. Louis to use v. Clemens, 49 Mo. 554; Sess. Acts 1870, pp. 478, 480, 481, secs. 1, 12, 14, 15 ; Skrainka v. Allen, 1 Mo. App. 387 ; Zoeller v. Kellogg, St. Louis Court of Appeals. cited: Haegele v. Mallinckrodt, 3 Mo. App. 329; Neenan v. Smith, 60 Mo. 292 ; Seibert v. Allen, 60 Mo. 486 ; Roger v. City of St. Charles, 54 Mo. 232.

1Opinion of the CourtHayden, J.

This is an action upon two special tax bills for constructing a sewer on Compton Avenue by authority of an ordinance approved June 16, 1873, under which the city engineer of the city of St. Louis let out to the plaintiff the construction of district sewers in Compton Avenue Sewer District, No. 21, between Morgan Street and Franklin Avenue and Garrison and Channing Avenues. The petition *546is in the usual form, and the answer puts in issue its material allegations. There was a trial before the court below, sitting as a jury, and a finding for the plaintiff, and judgment for the amount claimed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Egyptian Levee Co. v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  2. Lockwood v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  3. Garrett v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  4. Neenan v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  5. City of St. Louis ex rel. Seibert v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adams v. LindellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API