Legal Opinion

Dino Iacaponi v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 23, 1967No. 16259_1PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The appellant, plaintiff below, was seriously injured in an industrial accident. The appellee, as insurer of the appellant’s purported employer, induced the appellant to sign a “workmen’s compensation agreement” which subsequently defeated appellant’s effort to recover as an “independent contractor” in a negligence action he brought against his purported employer in a state court. Alleging that the insurance company induced him to sign the “workmen’s compensation agreement” by fraud, the appellant has brought this diversity action against the insurance company for damages.

T…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Iacoponi v. PliskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

4Cited by37 opinions

  1. Southern Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Gonzalez Abreau v. Banco CentralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
  4. Hauptmann v. WilentzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
  5. Randall v. Bank One National Ass'n (In Re Randall)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API