Legal Opinion
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. McKay
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 3, 1984No. Civ. R-82-248 BRTPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
BRUCE R. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The Tahoe Regional Planning Compact, a congressionally ratified interstate compact designed to control and manage the development and use of properties within the Lake Tahoe basin, establishes the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) as the governing agency of the basin for the limited purposes for which the Compact was formulated. With respect to the open meeting requirement (the “Sunshine Law”) applicable to TRPA meetings, the Compact provides: “All meetings shall be open to the public to the extent required by the law of the State of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bruce v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Kasper v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Wenke v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of College Park v. CotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. Brian McKay Attorney General of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Banks v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- City of College Park v. CotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- City of College Park v. CotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987