Hosiden Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GOLDBERG, Judge:
Plaintiffs, Hosiden Corporation, et al., bring this consolidated action challenging the final affirmative antidumping determination by the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”) in High Information Content Flat Panel Displays and Display Glass Therefor From Japan, 56 Fed.Reg. 32,376 (1991), the final affirmative injury determination by the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) in High Information Content Flat Panel Displays and Subassemblies Thereof From Japan, USITC Pub. 2413, Inv. No.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hosiden Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Hosiden Corp. v. Advanced Display Manufacturers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Hosiden Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Corporation, Apple Computer, Inc., International Business MacHines Corporation, Compaq Computer Corporation, Tandy Corporation, and Sharp Corporation v. Advanced Display Manufacturers of America, and Planar Systems, Inc., Plasmaco, Inc., Ois Optical Imaging Systems, Inc., Cherry Display Products Corporation, Electro-Plasma Inc., Photonics Technology, Inc., and Magnascreen Corporation, and Texas Instruments, Incorporated v. The United States, Advanced Display Manufacturers of America, and Planar Systems, Inc., Plasmaco, Inc., Ois Optical Imaging Systems, Inc., Cherry Display Products Corporation, Electro-Plasma Inc., Photonics Technology, Inc., and Magnascreen Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996