Legal Opinion
Hosiden Corp. v. Advanced Display Manufacturers of America
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 31, 1996No. 94-1380PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
In this antidumping duty case, the Advanced Display Manufacturers of America (ADMA) appeals the final decision of the United States Court of International Trade1 relating to imports of high-information content flat panel displays (HIC FPDs). The International Trade Commission (ITC or Commission) had determined that the appropriate procedure for analyzing the injury to the domestic industry was to cumulate the effect of sales at less than fair value (LTFV) of various electronic forms of HIC FPD, based on the Commission’s determination that the domestic industry…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Iwatsu Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Hosiden Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Corporation, Apple Computer, Inc., International Business MacHines Corporation, Compaq Computer Corporation, Tandy Corporation, and Sharp Corporation v. Advanced Display Manufacturers of America, and Planar Systems, Inc., Plasmaco, Inc., Ois Optical Imaging Systems, Inc., Cherry Display Products Corporation, Electro-Plasma Inc., Photonics Technology, Inc., and Magnascreen Corporation, and Texas Instruments, Incorporated v. The United States, Advanced Display Manufacturers of America, and Planar Systems, Inc., Plasmaco, Inc., Ois Optical Imaging Systems, Inc., Cherry Display Products Corporation, Electro-Plasma Inc., Photonics Technology, Inc., and Magnascreen Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996