Hill v. Hill
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRIA, Judge.
This appeal arises from sanctions imposed upon plaintiff on 15 January 2003 for violating N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 11 (2003) and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 6-21.5 (2003) in the underlying action, a dispute among the heirs of Sadie Clark Hill (“Sadie Hill” or “Sadie”). See Hill v. Hill, 147 N.C. App. 313, 556 S.E.2d 355 (2001) (“Hill I”) 1 . We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Sadie Hill was the mother of five children, including plaintiff Thomas W. Hill (“plaintiff’) and defendants Garford Tony Hill (“Tony Hill” or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Bryson v. SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McKinnon v. CV Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- McLennan v. C.K. Josey, Jr.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Hairston v. HarwardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- McKinney v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.