Legal Opinion

Krutz v. Stewart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8248PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Action by the. appellee, as the endorsee, against the appellants, as makers, of a promissory note, of the following tenor:

“$1,300. Florence, Sept. 18th, 1871.
“One day after date, we, the subscribers, of Florence, county of Switzerland, State of Indiana, promise to pay to the order of Mrs. C. A. Craig one thousand and three hundred dollars, value received, with ten per cent, interest from date, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws of the State of Indiana.

[Signed] “William G-. Krutz & Son,

“P. A. Bettens,
“John F. McCrary.”

The defendants answered in five paragraphs, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomasson v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Sheets v. PabodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1842

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Latta v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Rogers v. ZookIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Nugent v. LadukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Mathis v. BarnesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Daniels v. PriestSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API