Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1988No. 3273PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition for relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA). On appeal, appellant claims that the PCHA court erred in denying appellant’s petition without a hearing and asserts that his initial PCHA counsel, who filed a “no merit” letter, was ineffective for failing to raise the ineffectiveness of all prior counsel for failing to: (1) challenge the trial court’s permitting the Commonwealth to present evidence concerning appellant’s filing of an alibi notice; (2) challenge the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. SimonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. TervalonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. CruzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Com. v. Carroll, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Jones, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API