Legal Opinion

John Heineke v. Santa Clara University

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 20, 2020No. 18-16348PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN M. HEINEKE, No. 18-16348 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:17-cv-05285- LHK SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY; JANE DOE, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 7, 2020 San Francisco, California Filed July 20, 2020 Before: Richard A. Paez and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Lynn S. Adelman, * District Judge. Opinion by Judge Paez * The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, United States District…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. John Doe v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  2. (PS) Halajian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. (PS) Tanksley v. Elica Health CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Abrigo v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  5. Alcaraz v. HeltonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API