(PS) Tanksley v. Elica Health Center
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY, No. 2:20–cv–1850–KJM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS 13 v. (ECF No. 5) 14 ELICA HEALTH CENTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On September 14, 2020, plaintiff filed his complaint, which was labeled a “prisoner civil 18 rights case,” but the court reclassified the case as a pro se civil case.1 (ECF No. 1, 2.) The court 19 ordered plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, 20 and plaintiff chose…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.