Legal Opinion

Friston v. Mills

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided September 25, 2020No. 1:17-cv-00329Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION KEITH LEDELL FRISTON PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL NO. 1:17-CV-329-JCG ANDREW MILLS, Warden DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING WARDEN MILLS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Summary Judgment [33] filed by Defendant, Warden Andrew Mills. Plaintiff Keith Ledell Friston, a postconviction prisoner, has filed a Response [35] and Amended Response [36]. Having considered these submissions, the record, and applicable law, the Court finds that Warden Mills’ Motion for Summary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API