State v. White
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
Defendants contend that, in violation of G.S. 1-180, the trial judge impermissibly expressed an opinion on the evidence through his questioning of a witness at trial. During the direct examination of State’s witness Vivian Johnson, the trial judge interrupted and asked this question: “Did you say how much time elapsed from the time you saw ‘Monk’ in the vicinity of the door, with the gun, and when you saw Stanley shoot?” Defendant Stanley White objects to the question on the grounds that it assumes a fact that was for the jury’s determination, that is, whether the defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. WinfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AbeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. AleemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. SafritCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. AbeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982