Legal Opinion

Park Ecclesiastical Society v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from an assessment of benefits in the laying out and construction of a sewer by the city of Hartford, taken to the judge of the Court of Common Pleas, under the, proyisions of the city charter. Facts found by a committee, a re-assessment made, and the case reserved for advice. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

The common council of the city of Hartford constructed a sewer through High street and assessed the cost thereof upon the persons especially benefited thereby. Several parties appealed to the judge of the Court of Common Pleas, a committee was appointed who heard all the appeals and reported the facts and his doings to the judge, and the judge accepted the report and reserved the question as to the proper judgment to be rendered thereon for the advice of this court.

It appears that in 1854 a sewer was constructed through a portion of High street, the cost of which was assessed upon the parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Bridgeport v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
  2. New York & New Haven Railroad v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  3. City of Hartford v. West Middle DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cook v. City of AnsoniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Whitmore v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. Johnston v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Hunter Appeal from Doings of the Board of Sewer CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  5. Keller v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API