Legal Opinion

Hyde Park Town v. Chambers

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1939No. 6201PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Justice.

Hyde Park Town sought condemnation of a right of way for piping water over the Weeks’ Chambers’ tracts of lands. These lands lie outside the town. The Weeks and the Chambers contested the suit on the ground that the Town already had the right of way, and was merely seeking to cut off their tap rights in the Town’s pipe line and water; that the tap rights were the consideration for the granting of the right of way. The lower court denied the condemnation. Upon the counterclaim of Weeks and Chambers it granted them a perpetual right to 300 gallons of water per day. This was to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Genola Town v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Genola Town v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Park v. ALTA DITCH & CANAL COMPANYUtah Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API