Legal Opinion

Genola Town v. Santaquin City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1938No. 5983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The opinion of this court as heretofore rendered does not hold that a municipal corporation may directly or indirectly sell, alienate, or dispose of any of its water rights or sources of water supply or that it may exchange any of its water rights or sources of water supply which it has for culinary purposes, or the public supply of its inhabitants, tants, for water to be used for other than the public supply of its inhabitants. What we do hold is that a municipal corporation may exchange some of its water rights or water supply, even in constant flow, for other water or water rights,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northern Oil Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Dahl v. CayiasUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hyde Park Town v. ChambersUtah Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API