Legal Opinion
State v. Dickerson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 19, 2010No. A08-2060Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
On appeal from the district court’s denial of his postconviction petition, appellant Carlos Darell Dickerson contends that the district court erred by determining that: (1) the Interstate Agreement on Detainers did not apply here; and (2) appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to assert the protections of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers.
FACTS
On December 15, 2006, the state charged appellant Carlos Darell Dickerson with one count of first-degree assault in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.221, subd. 1 (2006). At the time…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Alabama v. BozemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.