Legal Opinion
Cammermeyer v. Aspin
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 1, 1994No. C92-942ZPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ZILLY, District Judge.
Margarethe Cammermeyer brings this declaratory judgment action against the Government claiming that her discharge from military service under Army Regulation 135— 175, based solely on her admission that she is a lesbian, violated her rights to equal protection of the laws guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. She also claims her discharge violated her right to privacy under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Ninth Amendments to the Constitution, her substantive due process rights under the Fifth Amendment and her right to freedom of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cammermeyer v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- Watson v. PerryDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1996
- Holmes v. California Army National GuardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Selland v. PerryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.