Legal Opinion
San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City & County of San Francisco
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 20, 2005No. 04-340PublishedCited by 350 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
This case presents the question whether federal courts may craft an exception to the full faith and credit statute, 28 U. S. C. § 1738, for claims brought under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Petitioners, who own and operate a hotel in San Francisco, California (hereinafter City), initiated this litigation in response to the application of a city ordinance that required them to pay a $567,000 “conversion fee” in 1996. After the California courts rejected petitioners’ various state-law takings claims, they advanced in the Federal District Court a series of federal takings claims…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by350 opinions
- Knick v. Township of ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Johnnie Savory v. William Cannon, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Kenneth Scott Nivens Glen Lance Maners Terri Lynn Stork v. Peter S. Gilchrist, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Chainey v. StreetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Roc Sansotta v. Town of Nags HeadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.