Legal Opinion

Episcopal Housing Corp. v. Federal Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 23, 1979No. 20969PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This appeal is from an order requiring the parties to submit to a consolidated arbitration proceeding. We affirm.

The owner of an apartment complex (Episcopal Housing Corporation) brought this action against the architect (Lafaye Associates, Inc.) and the builder (McCrory-Sumwalt Construction Co., Inc.) alleging defects in design and construction. The contract between the architect and the owner provided for arbitration as did the contract between the builder and the owner. Both the architect and the builder moved for arbitration, and a consolidated proceeding was ordered by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Episcopal Housing Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Grover-Dimond Associates, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Exber, Inc. v. Sletten Construction CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Robinson v. WarnerDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Litton Bionetics, Inc. v. Glen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Bazzle v. Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Plaza Development Services v. Joe Harden Builder, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. St. Francis Xavier Hospital v. Ruscon/AbcoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API